AI and Automated Tools Policy
AI and Automated Tools Policy
The KLISC Journal of Information Science and Knowledge Management (KLISC JISKM) recognises the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automated tools in scholarly research and publishing. The journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in all published work. This policy outlines the acceptable and prohibited uses of AI and automated tools throughout the research and publication process.
1. Authorship and Attribution
1.1 AI is Not an Author
AI tools and language models cannot be listed as co-authors or credited as authors on any manuscript submitted to KLISC JISKM. Authorship requires the ability to:
-
Take responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the work
-
Approve the final version for publication
-
Address questions and critiques regarding the research
-
Hold accountability for the content and conclusions presented
| Requirement | Detail |
|---|---|
| AI as Author | ❌ Not Permitted - AI tools cannot be credited as authors |
| Human Authorship | ✅ Required - All authors must be human beings who have made substantial contributions to the work |
| Accountability | ✅ Required - Human authors must take full responsibility for all content, including AI-generated portions |
2. AI Use in Manuscript Preparation
2.1 Permitted Uses
Authors may use AI and automated tools for the following purposes:
| Permitted Use | Description |
|---|---|
| Language Editing | Improving grammar, spelling, clarity, and style |
| Proofreading | Identifying and correcting typographical errors |
| Formatting Assistance | Assisting with reference formatting and manuscript structure |
| Literature Search | Identifying relevant literature and generating search queries |
| Data Visualization | Assisting with the creation of charts, graphs, and figures |
| Code Assistance | Aiding in code optimisation and debugging |
2.2 Prohibited Uses
The following uses of AI and automated tools are not permitted:
| Prohibited Use | Description | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Generating Substantive Content | Using AI to write entire sections, arguments, or conclusions | Undermines originality, authorship, and intellectual contribution |
| Creating Fabricated Data | Generating fake data, citations, references, or experimental results | Constitutes research misconduct and violates ethical standards |
| Plagiarism | Presenting AI-generated content as original thought without attribution | Violates academic integrity and plagiarism policies |
| Bypassing Originality | Using AI to paraphrase or rephrase existing work to avoid plagiarism | Does not constitute original scholarship |
| Imitating Human Authors | Attempting to present AI-generated output as human-authored content | Deceives reviewers, editors, and readers |
3. Disclosure Requirements
3.1 Mandatory Disclosure of AI Use
Authors must disclose the use of AI and automated tools in the preparation of their manuscript. This disclosure should be included in a dedicated section of the manuscript (e.g., "AI and Automated Tools Statement" or "Acknowledgements").
Disclosure Template:
"In preparing this manuscript, the authors used [Name of AI Tool/Model] for [specific purpose, e.g., language editing, grammar checking]. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the final content of the publication."
3.2 Scope of Disclosure
| Disclosure Component | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Tool Name | The specific name and version of the AI tool used |
| Purpose | A clear description of how the tool was used |
| Extent | The extent to which AI was used in the manuscript preparation |
| Human Oversight | A statement confirming that authors reviewed and edited all AI-generated content |
4. Reviewers and Editors
4.1 Confidentiality and Data Privacy
Reviewers and editors must not upload manuscripts or any portion thereof to AI tools for analysis, summarisation, or assistance. This includes:
-
Generative AI chatbots
-
Language models
-
AI-powered summarisation tools
-
AI-based editing or language tools
This prohibition is essential to protect:
| Protected Element | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Preventing unauthorised disclosure of research findings before publication |
| Intellectual Property | Protecting authors' original ideas and data |
| Privacy | Preventing exposure of patient data, sensitive information, or unpublished results |
4.2 Permitted Uses for Reviewers and Editors
Reviewers and editors may use AI tools for:
-
Grammar and spelling checking (provided the manuscript is not uploaded to cloud-based tools)
-
Reference checking and verification
-
Basic formatting assistance
4.3 Prohibited Uses for Reviewers and Editors
Reviewers and editors must not use AI tools for:
-
Generating or summarising peer review reports
-
Evaluating the novelty, significance, or quality of research
-
Making editorial decisions
-
Analysing data or results
5. Human Oversight and Accountability
5.1 Final Responsibility
Human authors retain full responsibility and accountability for all content submitted to KLISC JISKM. This includes:
| Responsibility | Description |
|---|---|
| Accuracy | Authors must ensure the accuracy and correctness of all content |
| Originality | Authors must ensure the work is original and properly cited |
| Integrity | Authors must ensure the work adheres to ethical research standards |
| Verification | Authors must verify and fact-check all AI-generated content |
| Accountability | Authors must take responsibility for any errors, omissions, or ethical breaches |
5.2 Verification Requirements
Before submitting a manuscript, authors must verify that:
-
All AI-generated content has been reviewed and edited by human authors
-
AI-generated citations and references are accurate and exist
-
AI-generated data and results are correct and verifiable
-
AI-generated analyses are sound and logically consistent
6. Editorial Oversight
6.1 Screening for AI Use
The editorial team may:
-
Screen submissions for AI-generated or AI-assisted content
-
Use plagiarism detection tools to identify potential misconduct
-
Request authors to demonstrate the absence of AI use or proper disclosure
-
Investigate concerns about AI-generated content, data fabrication, or manipulation
6.2 Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failure to comply with this AI policy may result in:
| Non-Compliance Action | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Undisclosed AI Use | Rejection of manuscript or request for correction |
| AI Attributed as Author | Rejection of manuscript and potential notification to institution |
| AI-Generated Fabricated Data | Investigation for research misconduct |
| AI Use by Reviewers | Removal from reviewer pool and potential notification to institution |
| Repeated Violations | Permanent ban from submitting to the journal |
7. Policy Alignment
This AI policy aligns with:
| Guideline | Reference |
|---|---|
| COPE | Committee on Publication Ethics: Authorship and AI |
| WAME | World Association of Medical Editors: AI in Publishing |
| STM | International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers: AI Ethics |
| DOAJ | Directory of Open Access Journals: AI Policy Requirements |
| Journal Practice | Increasing adoption of AI disclosure statements by journals |
8. Policy Updates
KLISC JISKM recognises that AI technology is rapidly evolving. This policy will be reviewed and updated periodically to reflect:
-
Emerging best practices in AI and scholarly publishing
-
Changes in ethical guidelines and industry standards
-
Feedback from authors, reviewers, and editors
Last Updated: August 2026
9. Contact Information
For questions regarding this AI and Automated Tools Policy, please contact the editorial office:
Email: journal@klisc.or.ke
Subject Line: AI Policy Inquiry